Today marks the birth of the most beloved of all the deities in the Hindu pantheon, Lord Krishna. This Godly figure, however, isn't distant and forbidding like the rest, maybe that's why He's so loved. And love is a more appropriate emotion for Him than mere veneration, because He is the god that resides where there is love.
Throughout the tale of His life, He never bothered about the ethics of dharma, or the fairness of religion with respect to his actions. That doesn't mean that He was as bad as those whom He opposed, just that He exemplified the view that 'Do unto others as they do unto you'. Those who know no right, who care not for niceties, for justice and righteousness, cannot be reformed using soft words and diplomacy. They must be dealt with in the same manner, as they treat others, for in that they realise the fundamental lesson: It could happen to us. A perpetrator of evil, when faced with a similar situation dawning upon himself, realises the folly of his actions, and is expected to reform. Krishna is the epitome of this thought process.
For me, when asked to choose between Rama and Krishna, the choice is a difficult one to make, and for many reasons. While Rama is the ideal man, His conduct with respect to His wife in the culmination of His legend brings to fore the inherent hypocrisies of the Hindu religion, which on one hand praises Him for his steadfast devotion to all that is righteous, and on the other hand, through His actions, sanctions the mistreatment of one's beloved for the safety of the throne. And there Krishna scores. Because His entire life was a game, meant at outwitting those who tormented their fellow beings, at their own play, using their own methods, His life isn't a contradiction; rather it's a open book.
One can search the ancient tomes, the songs of yore, the dramas, and one will find many references to Rama, and yet one can find more fond references to Krishna. His love for Radha, though in the end left unrequited, is an immortal tale of how love must be. His heroic rescue of the lady Rukmini and Hs subsequent marriage is an Indian girl's version of the tale of the knight in shining armour. His surrender of the throne to the aging Ugrasena, his great uncle, showed the purity of Hs character. His genius at defeating His enemies is the Indian equivalent of Sun Tzu, maybe even more the better because in the end, He always got the girl.
His guidance to the troubled Arjuna serves as the message that the Divine wishes to give to humanity: 'Do your duty fearlessly, without any expectation of results, and I shall manage the rest.' His protection of Draupadi, when her own wedded husbands failed to do so, speaks of the power of devotion. His city of Dwaraka, the impregnable island city, is a testament to the greatness of the skills of the Gods, and to that of the genius that is inherent in the Indian people.
In truth, Krishna is not a God. He is one of us, a common man, who laughs and cries with us, who plays with us, and frolics in our glee. He is present in each and every child whose aim is to break the Handi. His antics are the stuff of childhood lore, which every mother prays her own child emulate. His bravado is the type that young teenagers aim for, consciously or unconsciously. And His love is the reward that we all desire, for in the end,
'Who the Lord loves, no grief shall touch,Throughout the tale of His life, He never bothered about the ethics of dharma, or the fairness of religion with respect to his actions. That doesn't mean that He was as bad as those whom He opposed, just that He exemplified the view that 'Do unto others as they do unto you'. Those who know no right, who care not for niceties, for justice and righteousness, cannot be reformed using soft words and diplomacy. They must be dealt with in the same manner, as they treat others, for in that they realise the fundamental lesson: It could happen to us. A perpetrator of evil, when faced with a similar situation dawning upon himself, realises the folly of his actions, and is expected to reform. Krishna is the epitome of this thought process.
For me, when asked to choose between Rama and Krishna, the choice is a difficult one to make, and for many reasons. While Rama is the ideal man, His conduct with respect to His wife in the culmination of His legend brings to fore the inherent hypocrisies of the Hindu religion, which on one hand praises Him for his steadfast devotion to all that is righteous, and on the other hand, through His actions, sanctions the mistreatment of one's beloved for the safety of the throne. And there Krishna scores. Because His entire life was a game, meant at outwitting those who tormented their fellow beings, at their own play, using their own methods, His life isn't a contradiction; rather it's a open book.
One can search the ancient tomes, the songs of yore, the dramas, and one will find many references to Rama, and yet one can find more fond references to Krishna. His love for Radha, though in the end left unrequited, is an immortal tale of how love must be. His heroic rescue of the lady Rukmini and Hs subsequent marriage is an Indian girl's version of the tale of the knight in shining armour. His surrender of the throne to the aging Ugrasena, his great uncle, showed the purity of Hs character. His genius at defeating His enemies is the Indian equivalent of Sun Tzu, maybe even more the better because in the end, He always got the girl.
His guidance to the troubled Arjuna serves as the message that the Divine wishes to give to humanity: 'Do your duty fearlessly, without any expectation of results, and I shall manage the rest.' His protection of Draupadi, when her own wedded husbands failed to do so, speaks of the power of devotion. His city of Dwaraka, the impregnable island city, is a testament to the greatness of the skills of the Gods, and to that of the genius that is inherent in the Indian people.
In truth, Krishna is not a God. He is one of us, a common man, who laughs and cries with us, who plays with us, and frolics in our glee. He is present in each and every child whose aim is to break the Handi. His antics are the stuff of childhood lore, which every mother prays her own child emulate. His bravado is the type that young teenagers aim for, consciously or unconsciously. And His love is the reward that we all desire, for in the end,
Who the Lord protects, no harm shall come unto,
For the Lord is the Supreme,
And in Him, we place our lives.'
4 comments:
Referring to a particular section of your article which says 'Do unto others as they do unto you' - well I couldnt agree more on this one.
I strongly believe in a policy of 100 % reciprocity to all actions.
Consider militancy,or say rapes,or any crime for that matter...
Here we are talking about individuals who have engaged in extreme plunder and massacre of humanity:
militancy that has probably mauled an entire state or the entire nation itself permanently - a holy war it seems - i am sure no god will permit a holy war which victimises a 7 year old girl waiting at a bus stop to go to her school....what was her mistake?....are these the kind of people who deserve any human rights at all??
or consider , in my view, the worst possible crime ever - rape - ever thought of the psyche of the victim?....she lives with the horror and trauma of the act an entire life....are rapists the kind of people deserve a humanist approach...?
This might sound extremely uncivilized, but, if possible,such people deserve to be tortured to the helm...an extent which must deter others from repeating their atrocities....
Its time we second Krishna's outlook to life.
Vinay Venugopal
I agree. Even though ppl call Rama the ultimate upholder of Dharma, Krishna scores more simply because he was more human. It is easy to uphold Dharma when you are Godlike. Makes it that much more hard for mortals.
Ofcourse, he was human with only a few extra magic powers.
I think, after Ganpati, he is the most favourite God.
Nice post. *bows to you*
hey, nice post. just one thing, read vinay's response to ur post. Damn interesting. So if India were to initiate terrorism in response to terrorism from Pakistan ,where would we be?
The greatness of terrorism against civilised countries lies in the fact that in their response to terror, the "civilized countries" (read US/UK) lessen their right to be called civilized.
We all know the repurcussions of "hunt down and punish!"
Secondly, let me quote another common man all of us our familiar with - "An eye for an eye makes the world blind." - M.K. Gandhi
Mind you, Krishna never advocated that one must abandon all that is right in order to uphold the Dharma; he merely said that one must not expect the opponent to be as righteous and just as one is, for such anticipation is a fallacy. If the opponent were just, then the conflict would never arise.
I am myself not in favour of the general denunciation of human rights; however in cases that it is proven beyond reasonable doubt that the said individual has committed crimes against humanity, human rights is an aberration, a mockery of justice. My interpretation of Krishna follows the same logic. The innocent must be protected, and the guilty punished; but prove the guilt beyond doubt.
Post a Comment